A personal trading journal documenting my moves in crypto markets — the entries, exits, and reasoning behind every trade.
Picked up a position in Rayls ($RLS) today at $0.005161. I'll be the first to say I've been watching this one quietly for a while, and at this price level, I think the risk/reward is genuinely compelling. This isn't a meme coin play. This is a calculated bet on institutional blockchain infrastructure — and I think most people are sleeping on it.
So what does Rayls actually do? In simple terms, it's a blockchain built for banks. Rayls bridges traditional finance (TradFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi) through a hybrid architecture — private, permissioned chains for institutions on one side, and a public EVM-compatible chain for DeFi on the other. Banks and financial institutions can tokenize real-world assets like bonds, receivables, and deposits on their own private chains, while still tapping into public DeFi liquidity. It handles the things institutions actually care about: KYC compliance, transaction privacy through zero-knowledge proofs, and stable USD-pegged gas fees. This isn't theoretical — Brazil's Central Bank selected Rayls for their Drex CBDC pilot, and J.P. Morgan's Kinexys division ranked Rayls first among six evaluated privacy-focused blockchain solutions for institutional finance.
The tokenomics on this one are what really caught my attention. Total supply is fixed at 10 billion RLS. Every transaction across both public and private chains requires RLS to settle fees — meaning real institutional usage creates real demand. On top of that, 50% of all transaction fees are automatically burned, creating a deflationary loop that tightens supply as the network grows. The mainnet is set to launch in Q1 2026, with the Enygma privacy protocol and Privacy Node V3 rolling out through the rest of the year. We're sitting right before a series of major catalysts.
At a market cap under $10 million with $32.3 million in funding behind it, real institutional traction, and a fee-burn flywheel that hasn't even started spinning yet — I think this is one of those entries you look back on. I could be wrong. But I see this as a gem.
