A personal trading journal documenting my moves in crypto markets — the entries, exits, and reasoning behind every trade.
Closed $RLS Position, Delisting Notice Received
Closed the trade this morning. Not by choice of technicals, but by necessity — BloFin sent a delisting notification for the RLSUSDT perpetual, with all positions required to be closed before February 27, 2026 at 07:00 UTC. No point holding it to the wire.

The trade closed at $0.004903 against an entry of $0.004850, booking +10.95% on the 10X long. A clean exit all things considered.

This one was a bit of a rollercoaster across all three entries. First trade stopped out at breakeven. Re-entered with a better location after the wedge retest. Then a delisting forces the hand before the setup could fully play out. That's the game sometimes — you can be right on the thesis and still have external variables cut the trade short. Closed green. On to the next entry.

Re-Entered $RLS at $0.004850
Back in. And this time the entry feels cleaner than the first.
After getting stopped out at breakeven on the previous trade, I sat on my hands and waited. No chasing, no FOMO. I had a thesis — the 12H Falling Wedge — and I needed price to give me the right location before pulling the trigger again. That's exactly what happened.

The entry at $0.004850 was built on three layers of confluence hitting at the same time. First, the structural retest. The wedge had broken out on the higher timeframe, but an elite entry doesn't mean buying the breakout candle — it means waiting for price to come back and retest the upper trendline as new support. My limit order was sitting right at that level. Second, a liquidity sweep played out perfectly on the 5-minute chart. A sharp sell-off pushed price below the initial breakout point, running the stop-losses of retail traders who entered early. I was positioned to buy that exhaustion, not panic sell into it. Third, the FVGs on the 15-minute and 30-minute charts acted as a magnet, pulling price into that zone before the reversal. RSI on the 5-minute was printing around 20 — extreme oversold — signaling that sellers were running out of fuel.
The result is an entry at the exact pivot where sellers got exhausted and buyers stepped back in. I avoided the bull trap at $0.0050 that would have been an obvious but inferior entry, and instead secured a position with a significantly better risk-to-reward ratio.
Stop loss is managed. Now we let the trade breathe.

Stopped Out at Entry
Got stopped out at entry on the $RLS trade. No damage done — capital is safe and that's exactly what the stop was there for. This is disciplined trading, not a loss.
Looking at the chart now, the price action is actually telling an interesting story. There's a clear Falling Wedge forming (the red diagonal structure), which is traditionally a bullish reversal pattern. However, price is currently hugging the bottom support line, and the MACD is still showing bearish momentum with the histogram printing red bars and signal lines trending down. That tells me the selling pressure hasn't fully exhausted itself yet.
The RSI is sitting around 20.89 — deeply oversold — but oversold doesn't mean bounce. In a strong downtrend, RSI can stay pinned in oversold territory while price continues grinding lower toward unfilled imbalances. And that's exactly what I'm watching for.
The probable path I'm tracking plays out in three phases:
Price likely dips first into the green FVG zones around $0.004800 to fill those imbalances and find strong-hand buyers. From there, I'd expect a stabilization at what the chart labels "Bottom 2," ideally forming a double bottom or printing bullish RSI divergence as confirmation. Once those FVGs are mitigated, that's the fuel needed to break wedge resistance and push toward the $0.006334 target.
The invalidation scenario: If price enters those FVG zones and fails to hold, the falling wedge thesis breaks down and we could be looking at a deeper correction below $0.004600. I'll be watching that level closely.
For now, I'm on the sidelines with capital intact. No rush — I'll wait for the setup to confirm before re-entering. Patience is the edge here.

Picked up a position in Rayls ($RLS) today at $0.005161. I'll be the first to say I've been watching this one quietly for a while, and at this price level, I think the risk/reward is genuinely compelling. This isn't a meme coin play. This is a calculated bet on institutional blockchain infrastructure — and I think most people are sleeping on it.
So what does Rayls actually do? In simple terms, it's a blockchain built for banks. Rayls bridges traditional finance (TradFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi) through a hybrid architecture — private, permissioned chains for institutions on one side, and a public EVM-compatible chain for DeFi on the other. Banks and financial institutions can tokenize real-world assets like bonds, receivables, and deposits on their own private chains, while still tapping into public DeFi liquidity. It handles the things institutions actually care about: KYC compliance, transaction privacy through zero-knowledge proofs, and stable USD-pegged gas fees. This isn't theoretical — Brazil's Central Bank selected Rayls for their Drex CBDC pilot, and J.P. Morgan's Kinexys division ranked Rayls first among six evaluated privacy-focused blockchain solutions for institutional finance.
The tokenomics on this one are what really caught my attention. Total supply is fixed at 10 billion RLS. Every transaction across both public and private chains requires RLS to settle fees — meaning real institutional usage creates real demand. On top of that, 50% of all transaction fees are automatically burned, creating a deflationary loop that tightens supply as the network grows. The mainnet is set to launch in Q1 2026, with the Enygma privacy protocol and Privacy Node V3 rolling out through the rest of the year. We're sitting right before a series of major catalysts.
At a market cap under $10 million with $32.3 million in funding behind it, real institutional traction, and a fee-burn flywheel that hasn't even started spinning yet — I think this is one of those entries you look back on. I could be wrong. But I see this as a gem.
